Recent Posts

Interesting read: http://www.dibbukbox.com/story.htm

I watch a bunch of paranormal shows. My favorites in this order are Ghost Hunters, Ghost Adventures, and Ghost Lab.

The Ghost Adventures Live! show on 10/30 was so AWESOME. Zak and the gang had tons of experiences and evidence. I learned all about the spirit box from Jeff Belanger when I saw him speak at one of the TAPS conferences I attended, and Zak used it during the live investigation. It was really wild!

[The Others]

I really liked The Others starring Nicole Kidman, that was a really good movie, even though my mom ruined it for me by telling me the twist before I saw it!! grrrr....

I also liked The Skeleton Key starring Kate Hudson. That was also a great movie down in the Bayou in Louisiana! Woo woo!

I'm going to have to say gold ole Ghostbusters. Why? You may ask, because I saw that when I was a kid maybe just once or twice. Then, years and years later, I saw it again and got all those innuendos that went over my 5-year-old head. Seriously, I laughed something off that day.

I watched Paranormal Activity on Halloween night, and it was actually good! I thought it was gonna be terrible like the Blair Witch Project. I saw the original ending with the cops, and I was so creeped out at the end, as well as the whole movie. I watched it with my sister and I jumped a bunch of times. I know everyone is saying that they like the theatrical ending of the movie better than the original screener version, so I'm trying to find it so I can see the difference. Don't tell me how it was different, I wanna see for myself.

I liked how it was like the movie Signs where "less is more" with not actually showing the demon haunting them. It scares you more not actually seeing it. I also liked how the movie was like watching real people, they didn't seem like actors at all. It was cool how it was made in the "home video documentary" format.

I also liked how the paranormal investigation techniques, haunting details, and demologists stuff were accurate. Mika in the movie knew to record for EVPs and set the video camera to record every night. That's a lot of footage to go over the next day! The Ouija board thing creeped me out too, because I've had experiences with those and haven't used it since.

Great job! 

And Why are they doing an investigation with a small child in the room?

I've seen pictures like this before and clouds can look like that.

The first Phantasm
Then The Haunting
and Army of Darkness.

I enjoyed it because it made me jump a couple times, it didn't scare me at all, in fact I wanted to laugh a couple times and did.
Some woman screamed in the audience and another yelled out "Oh no you don't" which also made a lot of the audience laugh.
Most of the best seens are in the trailer. I told another friend to wait till its out on video and rent it.
As I watched the movie I thought Blair Witch Project.

Bigfoot, reality or made up?


People around the world report having seen a large human like, hair covered creature that walks upright.  Many of these descriptions are nearly identical.  There have been over eight hundred reports of a large hairy creature in the wilderness of Washington State alone.  I myself have never seen a Bigfoot but I do believe that man has not yet reached the pinnacle of total knowledge and therefore I believe that anything is possible.  I know that some of the reported sighting seem a little strange and sound like fakes to me, but does that mean that they are all fake?  For a possible answer to these questions we only need to look to our recent history. 

In the mountains of Rwanda a large hair covered creature was reported by the locals for years.  These reports were widely dismissed because at the time no one who was classified as a scientist had seen them.  In 1902 German Captain Robert von Beringe came across a large creature matching the description of the locals.  He was unable to identify the creature and was able to kill two of them in an attempt to identify them. The information below was taken from www.berggorilla.de

*At an altitude of 3,100 m, the two Germans put up their tent, after they had tried to level the ground with moss they had gathered. The ridge was so narrow that the tent pegs had to be fastened into the slopes. The askaris and the porters sheltered in rock caves and tried to protect themselves against the bitter cold with the help of fires.
And so the scene was set for the historic encounter that von Beringe described in the Deutsches Kolonialblatt:
From our camp we saw a herd of large black apes who were trying to climb the highest point of the volcano. We succeeded in killing two large individuals. With a great rumbling noise of falling rocks, they fell into a crater opening towards the northeast. After five hours of strenuous work we managed to get one animal up on a rope.
*The retrieved animal was a large, human-like, male ape with a body length of 1.5 m and a weight of more than 200 pounds. He had no chest hair, but enormous hands and feet.
"Unfortunately, I was not able to identify the genus the ape belonged to",
the Captain wrote with regret. He thought that it could not be a chimpanzee because of the animal's size, and, until then, the gorillas that were known to live in the lowlands had not been found in the area of the East African Great Lakes.

The population of the gorilla is now believed to be at about seven hundred.  That number has grown over the years from an original estimate of only around fifty.  With number this low the gorilla seem to not only maintain a population but have gone into a sort of population boom.  While researching the Bigfoot I discovered that some of the scientist who would weigh in on the Bigfoot estimated that there would need to be a population of over five thousand Bigfoot to support a "breeding population."  Why is this number so much higher for the Bigfoot? 
It only seems logical to believe that if you have two creatures of a similar nature and in similar habitat the numbers should also be closer.  A difference of more than four thousand seems a little hard to explain.  Is this a case of main stream science discriminating against the yet undiscovered Bigfoot, or are there other reasons to explain the difference in the numbers?

I don't have the answers to the questions but I am sure that some of you out there can help me with this topic.  Please feel free to respond with your thoughts and opinions’.